Private Health Care Funding - Myths and Realities


Below is a list of articles that identify problems with private for-profit health care funding. Click on the titles.

  1. Mythbusting Canadian Health Care - Part 1; by Sara Robinson


  2. The Health Care System Under French National Health Insurance: Lessons for Health Reform in the United States


  3. Insights From Health Care in Germany


  4. Parallel Private Health Insurance in Australia: A Cautionary Tale and Lessons for Canada


  5. Condition critical: Where two-tier hospitals are failing Australia


  6. What are the equity, efficiency, cost containment and choice implications of private health-care funding in western Europe?


  7. The high costs of for-profit care - Steffie Woolhandler and David U. Himmelstein - Canadian Medical Association Journal - June 2004


  8. "Mythbusters" by the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation

      Myth - User fees would stop waste and ensure better use of the health care system

      Myth - For-profit ownership would lead to a more efficient health care system

      Myth - A parallel private system would reduce waiting times in the public system

      Myth - Canada has a communist-style health care system

      Myth - Canadian doctors are leaving for the United States in droves















Navigation

CDM-MQRP
Evidence-informed and Values-driven


About the World Health Organization's ranking of Canada at 30th in "overall health-system performance..."

This study has been repeatedly cited as indicating "serious problems in the quality, accessibility, cost-effectiveness, or responsiveness of Canadian healthcare".

In fact, the WHO study demonstrates no such thing.

The [WHO] exercise ... has been severely criticized and found to be seriously flawed.
Read more>> Why Did the World Health Organization Rate Canada's Health System as 30th? Some Thoughts on League Tables; Raisa Deber, Longwoods Review, Vol. 2 No. 1 2004



Join CDM-MCRP